Other than the code itself, the certification process and its related tokenomics represent the largest vulnerability to the success of the protocol. This thread is meant to start the discussion of what the working group will actually need to be successful in its task.
IMO, the purpose of the CA is to design a system that both secures the certification process and generates demand for the PHONON token.
I’ll start with a list of fields I think the WG will need expertise in, which I think is the first step toward forming an actual budget for the WG proposal:
This is a major lift for the DAO and all contributions and suggestions are welcome, but I think the initial discussion should focus on the specifics of the mandate itself, and personnel requirements for the group, rather than the process itself.